| |
| "ME TOO" EVIDENCE MAY BE HEARD |
| (Sprint/United Management v. Mendelsohn) |
| |
| LIQUIDATED DAMAGES UNDER ADEA ARE APPLICABLE TO PUBLIC EMPLOYERS |
| (Cross v. New York City Transit Auth.) |
| |
| MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENT MODIFIED TO BE ENFORCEABLE |
| (Scovill v. WSYX/ABC, 6th Cir.) |
| |
| FAILURE TO POST NOTICES JUSTIFIES EQUITABLE TOLLING |
| (Mercado v. Ritz-Carlton San Juan Hotel, Spa & Casino, 1st Cir., Hammer v. Cardio Med. Prods., Inc., 3d Cir.) |
| |
| 72 YEAR OLD APPLICANT BRINGS ADEA CLAIM |
| (EEOC v. Massey Yardley Chrysler Plymouth Inc., 11th Cir..) |
| |
| YOUNGER REPLACEMENTS IRRELEVENT IN ADEA CASE |
| (Grimm v. Alro Steel Corp.,7th Cir.) |
| |
| IBM'S RELEASE DID NOT WAIVE ADEA CLAIMS |
| (Thomforde v. International Bus Machs. Corp., 8th Cir.) |
| |
| WHEN IS A PARENT LIABLE FOR SUBSIDIARY'S ACTIONS? |
| (Leichihman v. Pickwick Int'l 8th Cir) |
| |
| REPLACED BY YOUNGER WORKER |
| (Keating v. Harsco Corp. 8th Cir.) |
| |
| AGEIST REMARK IGNORED |
| (Glanzman v. Metropolitan Mgmt. Corp. 3d Cir.) |
| |
| NO FAILURE TO REHIRE |
| (Smith v. J. Smith Lanier & Co., 11th Cir.) |
| |
| RIF WAS UNLAWFUL |
| (Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab) |
| |
| UNION CONTRACT VIOLATES ADEA |
| (Abrahamsom v. Board of Educ. of the Wappingers Falls Cent. Sch. Dist., 2nd Cir.) |
| |
| NO DIRECT EVIDENCE NEEDED TO PROVE AGE CASE |
| (Rachid v. Jack in the Box, Inc.) |
| |
| USELESS OLD LADY |
| (Hill v. Lockheed Martin Logistics Mgmt Inc., 4th Cir) |
| |
| NO YOUNGER REPLACEMENT NEEDED TO PROVE AGE DISCRIMINATION AFTER LAYOFF |
| (Cichewicz v. UNOVA Indus. Automotive Sys. Inc., 6th Cir.) |
| |
| SUPREME COURT ALLOWS REVERSE AGE DISCRIMINATION |
| (General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. v. Cline) |
| |
| AGEIST REMARK PRECLUDES DISMISSAL OF ADEA CLAIM |
| (Ferrell v. Leake & Watts Servc. Inc., 2d Cir.) |
| |
| CASH BALANCE PENSION PLAN |
| (Cooper v. IBM Personal Pension Plan, S.D. Ill.) |
| |
| WHEN WILL HE RETIRE? |
| (Evenson v. Maytag Appliances Sales Co., D. Minn.) |
| |
| ADEA DOES NOT APPLY TO FOREIGN PARENT |
| (Haugh v. Schroder Investment Mgmt., S.D.N.Y.) |
| |
| UNINVITED GUESTS LAWFULLY BOOTED |
| (Balderston v. Fairbanks Morse, W.D. Wis.) |
| |
| NO EVIDENCE OF AGE DISCRIMINATION |
| (Mayer v. Nextel West Corp.) |
| |
| AGE DISCRIMINATION FOUND -- BUT CASE DISMISSED |
| (Steger v. General Electric) |
| |
| ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION PAMPHLETS |
| (Keown v. Richfood Holdings, E.D. Pa.) |
| |
| STRAY REMARKS |
| (Wallace v. O.C. Tanner Recognition Co. 1st Cir.) |
| |
| REVERSE AGE DISCRIMINATION |
| (Cline v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.) |
| |
| ACCOUNTANT FIRED AFTER 40 YEARS CAN'T SUSTAIN AGE CLAIM |
| (Lesch v. Crown Cork & Seal Co. 7th Cir.) |
| |
| PRETEXT NOT ESTABLISHED IN ADEA ACTION |
| (Dorsey v. Pinnacle Automation Co.) |
| |
| PARTNER v. EMPLOYEE |
| (EEOC V. Sidley & Austin, N.D. Ill.) |
| |
| PORT AUTHORITY IGNORES POLICY WHEN IMPLEMENTING RIF |
| (Baron v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey) |
| |
| EMPLOYER LIABLE FOR MANAGER IGNORANCE |
| (Mathis v. Phillips Chevrolet, Inc.) |
| |
| 31 REASONS FOR FIRING BARS ADEA CLAIM |
| (Horwite v. Board of Educ., Avoca Sch., Dist. Seventh Circuit) |
| |
| FAULTY BUSINESS JUDGEMENT |
| (Sprenger v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines 8th Cir.) |
| |
| ADEA RETALIATION SUIT REQUIRES PLAINTIFF TO BE QUALIFIED |
| (Holtzclaw v. DSC Communications Corp.) |
| |
| DISPARATE IMPACT CLAIMS UNDER THE ADEA |
| (Adams v. Florida Power Corp.) |
| |
| COSTLIER OLDER WORKER LAWFULLY FIRED |
| (Elliot v. British Tourist Authority S.D.N.Y.) |
| |
| $6.24 MILLION AGE DISCRIMINATION VERDICT OVERTURNED |
| (Baralt v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.) |
| |
| WHO IS THE EMPLOYER? |
| (Heinemeier v. Chemetco, Inc.) |
| |
| SETTLING AGE DISCRIMINATION CASES |
| See www.eeoc.gov. |
| |
