EEO News: Employment Law Case Headlines A Service of Interactive Employment Training, Inc.

Employment Law Case Headlines
Search EEO News
Web
 
EEONews.com
HRTrain.com
   News
   HR Links
   Employment
   Lawyers
   EEO Training
   EEO Legal Links
   Employment
   Seminars/
   Webcasts
   EEO News Home
 
 
 
NO DIRECT EVIDENCE NEEDED TO PROVE AGE CASE
 
 
If a plaintiff demonstrates that age was a motivating factor in an employment decision, defendant must prove that it would have made the same decision regardless of age. The Fifth Circuit finds that no direct evidence need be shown in a mixed motive case.
 
(Rachid v. Jack in the Box, Inc.)
 
 
»  Back to ADEA Headlines   |   »  Back to News
 

 
 
 
"employment law - discrimination - EEOC - human resources"