EEO News: Employment Law Case Headlines A Service of Interactive Employment Training, Inc.

Employment Law Case Headlines
Search EEO News
Web
 
EEONews.com
HRTrain.com
   News
   HR Links
   Employment
   Lawyers
   EEO Training
   EEO Legal Links
   Employment
   Seminars/
   Webcasts
   EEO News Home
 
 
 
YOUNGER REPLACEMENTS IRRELEVENT IN ADEA CASE
 
 
Twelve warehousemen alleged age discrimination because they were replaced by younger workers. The case was dismissed because "the relevant similarly situated workers are not the workers' replacements but the five warehousemen . . . who were under 40. . . the young workers were treated exactly like the older workers - all were let go."
 
(Grimm v. Alro Steel Corp.,7th Cir.)
 
 
»  Back to ADEA Headlines   |   »  Back to News
 

 
 
 
"employment law - discrimination - EEOC - human resources"