This is a notification that can be used for cookie consent or other important news. It also got a modal window now! Click "learn more" to see it!
OKLearn MoreWe may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, you cannot refuse them without impacting how our site functions. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website.
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
MORGAN STANLEY TO PAY $54 MILLION – EEONews
UncategorizedAs part of the settlement, Morgan Stanley agreed to work on the following: management and employee training programs, anti-discrimination policies, complaint tracking, promotion and compensation analysis, exit interviews of female employees leaving the Company voluntarily and retention and promotion programs.
DESTRUCTION OF ELECTRONIC DATA – EEONews
UncategorizedAmy Wiginton filed a class action sexual harassment complaint. Her attorney asked her previous employer to preserve emails which allegedly evidenced sexual harassment. The Company preserved only the emails pertaining to Ms. Wiginton. Other emails were destroyed. The Magistrate Judge found the destruction of electronic evidence to be in bad faith and possibly sanctionable.
FOUR YEARS OF DAILY OFFENSIVE STATEMENTS DOES NOT ESTABLISH TITLE VII CLAIM – EEONews
UncategorizedA female clerk alleged four years of daily lewd and offensive remarks made about women in her presence. The court looked at: (1) the frequency; (2) severity; (3) whether the statements were threatening or humiliating or an offensive utterance; and (4) whether the statements unreasonably interfered with work performance. The Eighth Circuit dismissed the case.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIM DISMISSED – EEONews
UncategorizedA server at a hotel restaurant filed a complaint for sexual harassment, among other things, after she was fired. Her complaint was dismissed because the hotel had an effective sexual-harassment reporting policy and the plaintiff unreasonably failed to take advantage of the hotelís corrective policy.
EMPLOYER NOT LIABLE FOR SUPERVISOR'S BOORISH BEHAVIOR – EEONews
UncategorizedA nurse’s supervisor was found to be “boorish, offensive and uncouth.” However, the employer was not responsible for his sexual harassment because it took immediate corrective action. The supervisor was barred from “solo encounters” with the nurse. This response was deemed effective.
“BAREFOOT AND PREGNANT” – EEONews
UncategorizedThe Seventh Circuit writes: “the parties appear to have simply collected the sum total of all the unpleasant events in Volovsek’s work history since 1992, dumped them in the legal mixing bowl of this lawsuit, set the Title VII-blender to puree and poured the resulting blob on the court.” One “barefoot and pregnant” comment stood out because it was made around the time Volovsek was denied a promotion. Her failure to promote claim is therefore good enough to be presented to a jury. Her harassment claim is dismissed because Volovsek failed to show harm.
NO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE WHERE SUPERVISOR WITNESSED HARASSMENT – EEONews
UncategorizedTwo alleged victims of sexual harassment failed to complain pursuant to company policy. Their case was not dismissed because supervisors allegedly witnessed the sexual harassment and failed to take corrective action.
ABORTION RIGHTS ACTIVIST FIRED BY CATHOLIC SCHOOL – EEONews
UncategorizedThe teacher was told that she must recant her position on abortion or be fired. After she was fired, she brought a sex discrimination and Pregnancy Discrimination Act claim. The Court dismissed the case because it did not want to become entangled in church doctrine in violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution.
$15 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES AWARDED BY JURY – EEONews
UncategorizedA marketing coordinator was awarded $15 million in punitive damages after a trial in a sexual harassment case. Because Title VII caps punitive damages at $300,000, the award will be reduced to $300,000.
SEX BET NOT UNLAWFUL – EEONews
UncategorizedAt a trade show, a customer service coordinator learned that her co-worker bet a customer that the customer could not have intimate sexual contact with her. The court found that this one incident was not sufficiently egregious to constitute a hostile work environment. The court considered the fact that her co-worker lacked significant supervisory authority and made the bet outside of her presence when making its decision.