A supervisor required a subordinate insurance agent to engage in sex acts or face employment termination. The District Court dismissed the case because of the affirmative defenses afforded to employers. The Second Circuit overruled finding that such a threat is a tangible employment action. Because of the tangible employment action, the affirmative defenses did not apply.
https://eeonews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2021/12/logonew2-300x48.png 0 0 linkbuild1 https://eeonews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2021/12/logonew2-300x48.png linkbuild12012-02-06 14:29:322012-02-06 14:29:32REQUIRED SEX ACTS - EEONews